LumabrivsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lumabri | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 202 | 13 311 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
Lumabri details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Lumabri, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with