LumabrivsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lumabri | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 202 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
Lumabri details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Lumabri, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with