Lumabrivssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lumabri | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 202 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
Lumabri ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Lumabri details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep Lumabri, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with