LumabrivsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lumabri | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 203 | 28 971 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +458 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+458 stars in 30 days).
Lumabri details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Lumabri, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with