LuantivsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Luanti | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Game Servers | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 13 789 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.17.0 · 20 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
Luanti scores 77/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Luanti ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Luanti is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Luanti is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Luanti details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep Luanti, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with