Grafana LokivsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grafana Loki | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 29 090 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; Grafana Loki needs more configuration.
Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
Grafana Loki details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep Grafana Loki, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with