Grafana Lokivsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grafana Loki | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 29 086 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 33 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Grafana Loki.
If you want the quickest setup, Grafana Loki is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
Grafana Loki details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep Grafana Loki, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with