logstashvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logstash | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 969 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 6 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
logstash and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
logstash ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, logstash is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
logstash details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep logstash, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with