DaguvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dagu | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 4 491 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +417 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 65 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.24.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 68/100 for Dagu, so it is the safer default.
Dagu ships more often: 65 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Dagu is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Dagu is growing faster right now (+417 stars in 30 days).
Dagu details →Tube Archivist details →