logpastevsquickdrop
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logpaste | quickdrop | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #83 of 166 in Developer Tools | #40 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 341 | 432 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.3.4 · 30 Mar 2026 | v2.0.2 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
quickdrop scores 52/100 against 49/100 for logpaste, so it is the safer default.
quickdrop ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logpaste.
If you want the quickest setup, logpaste is easier to run; quickdrop needs more configuration.
quickdrop is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
logpaste details →quickdrop details →