logforgevstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logforge | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 24 054 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +776 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logforge.
If you want the quickest setup, logforge is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
logforge details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep logforge, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with