logchimpvsMedusaJs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logchimp | MedusaJs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Product Management | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 1 133 | 36 990 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +550 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.9.2 · 5 Sept 2026 | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 53/100 for logchimp, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for logchimp.
If you want the quickest setup, logchimp is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).
logchimp details →MedusaJs details →
Swap a project
Keep logchimp, compare it with
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with