LocustvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Locust | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 28 246 | 2 385 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Locust scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Syslog-ng, so it is the safer default.
Locust ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.
If you want the quickest setup, Locust is easier to run; Syslog-ng needs more configuration.
Locust is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).
Locust details →Syslog-ng details →
Swap a project
Keep Locust, compare it with
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with