LocustvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Locust | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 28 245 | 35 784 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +859 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 28 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 78/100 for Locust, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Locust.
If you want the quickest setup, Locust is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+859 stars in 30 days).
Locust details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Locust, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with