LocustvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Locust | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 28 245 | 61 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +478 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Locust, so it is the safer default.
Locust ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Locust is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+478 stars in 30 days).
Locust details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep Locust, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with