Roborock Local ServervsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 206 | 95 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +2 357 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with