Local Deep ResearchvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 9 440 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +310 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Local Deep Research scores 74/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Local Deep Research is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+310 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with