Local Deep Researchvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 9 442 | 93 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +312 | +1 271 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 271 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with