Local Deep ResearchvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 9 439 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 24 for Local Deep Research.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with