llama.cppvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 | 33 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 250 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Warpgate details →