llama.cppvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 | 2 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | C# |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Vigil365 details →