llama.cppvsSerendipity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Serendipity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 132 757 | 229 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 302 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1469 | 2 |
| Latest release | b11985 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.6.1 · 22 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 53/100 for Serendipity, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1469 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Serendipity.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 302 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Serendipity details →