llama.cppvsrebacklogs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | rebacklogs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1457 | 10 |
| Latest release | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →rebacklogs details →