llama.cppvsProxMenux
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | ProxMenux | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 | 3 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 | 5 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 250 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →ProxMenux details →