llama.cppvspidoors
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | pidoors | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #69 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 26 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 | 19 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for pidoors.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →pidoors details →