llama.cppvsopenobserve
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | openobserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 132 628 | 22 562 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 271 | +445 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1457 | 22 |
| Latest release | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 78/100 for openobserve, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for openobserve.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →openobserve details →