llama.cppvsOpenCode Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | OpenCode Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 | 906 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 | 10 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 55/100 for OpenCode Manager, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenCode Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenCode Manager is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →OpenCode Manager details →