llama.cppvsopenclaw-nerve
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | openclaw-nerve | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #22 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 | 11 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.5.4 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 56/100 for openclaw-nerve, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for openclaw-nerve.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →openclaw-nerve details →