llama.cppvsopenase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | openase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #64 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 132 628 | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 271 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1455 | 8 |
| Latest release | b11963 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.8.0 · 13 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for openase, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1455 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for openase.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; openase needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →openase details →