llama.cppvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 | 9 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 | +60 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 | 5 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Octoprint details →