llama.cppvsnostr-watch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | nostr-watch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 132 679 | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 224 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1462 | 3 |
| Latest release | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →nostr-watch details →