nostr-watchvsOllama
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nostr-watch | Ollama | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 185 150 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 51 |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | v0.40.13 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Ollama scores 95/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
Ollama ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.
If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 497 stars in 30 days).
nostr-watch details →Ollama details →
Swap a project
Keep nostr-watch, compare it with
Keep Ollama, compare it with