livekitvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 21 899 | 16 061 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +824 | +246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 31 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
livekit and Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+824 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with