livekitvsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 21 912 | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +813 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
If you want the quickest setup, R2R is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+813 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with