AudiobookshelfvsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 14 845 | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +408 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+408 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with