livekitvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 21 912 | 9 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +813 | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+813 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with