livekitvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with