OctoBotvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
OctoBot details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with