livekitvsNewtArr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | NewtArr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #111 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 899 | 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +824 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 24 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 43/100 for NewtArr, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for NewtArr.
If you want the quickest setup, NewtArr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+824 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →NewtArr details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep NewtArr, compare it with