litellmvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 62 265 | 89 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 690 | +2 388 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
litellm scores 88/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.
litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, litellm is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
litellm details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with