litellmvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 62 265 | 93 043 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 690 | +1 249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
litellm and uptime-kuma score the same (88/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; litellm needs more configuration.
litellm is growing faster right now (+2 690 stars in 30 days).
litellm details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with