litellmvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 62 239 | 24 037 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 732 | +777 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 109 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.106.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
litellm scores 88/100 against 83/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.
litellm ships more often: 109 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, litellm is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
litellm is growing faster right now (+2 732 stars in 30 days).
litellm details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with