LiquidsoapvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Liquidsoap | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 742 | 13 312 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | OCaml | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
Liquidsoap ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
Liquidsoap details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with