LiquidsoapvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Liquidsoap | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 742 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | OCaml | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
Liquidsoap details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with