LiquidsoapvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Liquidsoap | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 742 | 93 418 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 144 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | OCaml | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).
Liquidsoap details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with