LinuxCNCvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinuxCNC | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 45 054 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +1 653 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).
LinuxCNC details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep LinuxCNC, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with