LightRAGvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LightRAG | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in RAG | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 40 406 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +561 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 · 2 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
LightRAG scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
LightRAG ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, LightRAG is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
LightRAG is growing faster right now (+561 stars in 30 days).
LightRAG details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep LightRAG, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with