LightRAGvsyoutube-dl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LightRAG | youtube-dl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in RAG | #6 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 40 403 | 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +558 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 · 2 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
LightRAG scores 82/100 against 51/100 for youtube-dl, so it is the safer default.
LightRAG ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for youtube-dl.
If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl is easier to run; LightRAG needs more configuration.
LightRAG is growing faster right now (+558 stars in 30 days).
LightRAG details →youtube-dl details →
Swap a project
Keep LightRAG, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl, compare it with