Life K-LinevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Life K-Line | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Data Visualization | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 434 | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 22 Dec 2025 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 49/100 for Life K-Line, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Life K-Line.
If you want the quickest setup, Life K-Line is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
Life K-Line details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Life K-Line, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with