LidaTubevsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LidaTube | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 31 in Music | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 367 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.2.58 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 46/100 for LidaTube, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for LidaTube.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
LidaTube details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep LidaTube, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with